Skip to content Skip to navigation Skip to collection information

You are here: Home » Content » American Health Economy Illustrated » 19.12 US Has More Avoidable Deaths Amenable to Health Care among Industrialized Nations

Navigation

Table of Contents

Recently Viewed

This feature requires Javascript to be enabled.
Download
×

Download collection as:

  • EPUB (what's this?)

    What is an EPUB file?

    EPUB is an electronic book format that can be read on a variety of mobile devices.

    Downloading to a reading device

    For detailed instructions on how to download this content's EPUB to your specific device, click the "(what's this?)" link.

  • More downloads ...

Download module as:

  • PDF
  • EPUB (what's this?)

    What is an EPUB file?

    EPUB is an electronic book format that can be read on a variety of mobile devices.

    Downloading to a reading device

    For detailed instructions on how to download this content's EPUB to your specific device, click the "(what's this?)" link.

  • More downloads ...
Reuse / Edit
×

Collection:

Module:

Add to a lens
×

Add collection to:

Add module to:

Add to Favorites
×

Add collection to:

Add module to:

 

19.12 US Has More Avoidable Deaths Amenable to Health Care among Industrialized Nations

Module by: Christopher Conover. E-mail the author

Summary: Despite its superiority in many health outcomes related to medical care, the United States has relatively more avoidable deaths amenable to health care than do many other industrialized countries.

The United States ranks nineteenth among industrialized countries in the rate of deaths amenable to health care (figure 19.12). "Amenable deaths" refer to deaths from selected causes that should not occur in the presence of timely and effective health care. Such deaths constitute approximately 25 percent of deaths for males who are younger than age 75 and approximately 30 percent of deaths in that age group for females. An important advantage of this measure is that it excludes deaths that do not necessarily reflect problems of access or quality of the medical care system. The death rates used to calculate the estimates in figure 19.12 were standardized by gender and five-year age categories. Thus, observed differences cannot be attributed to basic demographic differences in the U.S. population compared with elsewhere.

Compared with many other OECD countries, the United States has a higher death rate from conditions amenable to health care.

However, the numbers are not standardized based on race. In light of widespread racial and ethnic disparities in U.S. health outcomes—little of which reflect poor health system performance—this limitation might disproportionately cast the United States in a worse light. Moreover, the authors of the study that produced these data have cautioned, "The rate of amenable mortality is a valuable indicator of health care system performance, although it is important to note that the underlying concept should not be mistaken as definitive evidence of differences in the effectiveness of health care but rather as an indicator of potential weaknesses in health care that can then be investigated in more depth."

With these caveats, the available data show that some OECD countries have rates much lower than in the United States. For example, France and Japan have rates approximately 40 percent less than in the United States. Even the UK, which lagged behind in some of the comparisons of cancer survival rates and infant mortality by birth-weight, outperforms the United States on this metric. Second, amenable mortality rates declined only 4 percent in the United States between 1997-1998 and 2002-2003, compared with an average decline of 17 percent among all countries studied. This fact suggests that the United States is falling behind rather than catching up to its competitors on this measure.

References

  1. Nolte E and CM McKee. Measuring the Health of Nations: Updating an Earlier Analysis. Health Affairs 2008; 27(1):58-71.

Collection Navigation

Content actions

Download:

Collection as:

EPUB (?)

What is an EPUB file?

EPUB is an electronic book format that can be read on a variety of mobile devices.

Downloading to a reading device

For detailed instructions on how to download this content's EPUB to your specific device, click the "(?)" link.

| More downloads ...

Module as:

PDF | EPUB (?)

What is an EPUB file?

EPUB is an electronic book format that can be read on a variety of mobile devices.

Downloading to a reading device

For detailed instructions on how to download this content's EPUB to your specific device, click the "(?)" link.

| More downloads ...

Add:

Collection to:

My Favorites (?)

'My Favorites' is a special kind of lens which you can use to bookmark modules and collections. 'My Favorites' can only be seen by you, and collections saved in 'My Favorites' can remember the last module you were on. You need an account to use 'My Favorites'.

| A lens I own (?)

Definition of a lens

Lenses

A lens is a custom view of the content in the repository. You can think of it as a fancy kind of list that will let you see content through the eyes of organizations and people you trust.

What is in a lens?

Lens makers point to materials (modules and collections), creating a guide that includes their own comments and descriptive tags about the content.

Who can create a lens?

Any individual member, a community, or a respected organization.

What are tags? tag icon

Tags are descriptors added by lens makers to help label content, attaching a vocabulary that is meaningful in the context of the lens.

Module to:

My Favorites (?)

'My Favorites' is a special kind of lens which you can use to bookmark modules and collections. 'My Favorites' can only be seen by you, and collections saved in 'My Favorites' can remember the last module you were on. You need an account to use 'My Favorites'.

| A lens I own (?)

Definition of a lens

Lenses

A lens is a custom view of the content in the repository. You can think of it as a fancy kind of list that will let you see content through the eyes of organizations and people you trust.

What is in a lens?

Lens makers point to materials (modules and collections), creating a guide that includes their own comments and descriptive tags about the content.

Who can create a lens?

Any individual member, a community, or a respected organization.

What are tags? tag icon

Tags are descriptors added by lens makers to help label content, attaching a vocabulary that is meaningful in the context of the lens.

Reuse / Edit:

Reuse or edit collection (?)

Check out and edit

If you have permission to edit this content, using the "Reuse / Edit" action will allow you to check the content out into your Personal Workspace or a shared Workgroup and then make your edits.

Derive a copy

If you don't have permission to edit the content, you can still use "Reuse / Edit" to adapt the content by creating a derived copy of it and then editing and publishing the copy.

| Reuse or edit module (?)

Check out and edit

If you have permission to edit this content, using the "Reuse / Edit" action will allow you to check the content out into your Personal Workspace or a shared Workgroup and then make your edits.

Derive a copy

If you don't have permission to edit the content, you can still use "Reuse / Edit" to adapt the content by creating a derived copy of it and then editing and publishing the copy.

  • © 2012 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.
  • The University of Minnesota is an equal opportunity educator and employer. Privacy
  • Last modified on Sep 24, 2013 3:48 pm -0500