Skip to content Skip to navigation

You are here: Home » Content » Health Spending Outgrew Economy

Navigation

Recently Viewed

This feature requires Javascript to be enabled.
Download
×

Download module as:

  • PDF
  • EPUB (what's this?)

    What is an EPUB file?

    EPUB is an electronic book format that can be read on a variety of mobile devices.

    Downloading to a reading device

    For detailed instructions on how to download this content's EPUB to your specific device, click the "(what's this?)" link.

  • More downloads ...
Reuse / Edit
×

Module:

Add to a lens
×

Add module to:

Add to Favorites
×

Add module to:

 

Health Spending Outgrew Economy

Module by: Christopher Conover. E-mail the author

Summary: For 80 years, growth in real per capita health spending almost always outpaced growth in the rest of the economy by as much as 6 percentage points.

Note: You are viewing an old version of this document. The latest version is available here.

For 80 years, per capita health spending has grown persistently each year from one to six percentage points faster than the non-health portion of the economy. Since 1929, annual growth in per capita NHE (4.1 percent) was slightly more than double the rate experienced in the rest of the economy.

However, the size of the disparity has changed dramatically over this period (figure 1.5a). Health spending growth has outpaced general economic growth by the largest margins during periods of significant expansions of public health insurance coverage (the introduction of Medicare and Medicaid in the 1960s, Medicaid expansion in the 1980s), and years marked by poor economic performance (for example, stagflation during the 1970s).

After adjusting for inflation, increased health spending per person has outstripped the increase in non-health GDP per capita for many decades.

The more fine-grained data shown (figure 1.5b) are for a shorter time but demonstrate how infrequently annual growth in per capita non-health sector GDP has outpaced the rate of increase in NHE per capita since 1960. Rather than exhibiting a common pattern, the few cases in which this has occurred have unique explanations.

Since 1960, annual growth in inflation-adjusted health costs per U.S. resident fell below the rise in non-health costs per capita only seven times.

It is worth emphasizing from the previous discussion what these trends do (and do not) imply. Both sets of growth rates have been calculated from "real" (inflation- adjusted) per capita estimates of NHE and non-health sector GDP (that is, GDP minus NHE), using the GDP deflator to remove the effects of general economy-wide inflation. (Using chained dollars is a more precise way of measuring inflation than using the standard CPI.) Including the effects of health-specific inflation, the higher observed growth in real per capita NHE does not imply that growth in per capita health output has been double that of the rest of the economy. As well, components of both NHE and GDP reflect investments in capital or research and development (R&D) that might not pay off until future years. Thus, the growth rate differential is not a precise comparison of how Americans have consumed health care relative to everything else.

Our apparent willingness to increase expenditures on health care even during periods that the real economy is shrinking is suggestive of the relative priority of health care over everything else. Conversely, to date Americans have been able to enjoy a rising standard of living notwithstanding their high level of spending on health.

Downloads

Download Excel tables used to create both figures: Figures 1.5a/1.5b Tables. Figures 1.5a and 1.5b both were created from the following table (the workbook includes all supporting tables used to create this table):

  • Fig. 1.5a: Table 1.5. Compound Annual Growth in U.S. Per Capita Real National Health Expenditures, GDP and Non-health GDP (chained 2005 dollars): 1929 to 2021
  • Fig. 1.5b: Table 1.5.1 Compound Annual Growth in U.S. Per Capita Real National Health Expenditures, GDP and Non-health GDP (chained 2009 dollars): 1929 to 2021

Download PowerPoint versions of both figures.

References

  1. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). National Health Expenditures Accounts: Methodology Paper, 2011. Definitions, Sources, and Methods. 2011a. Available at: http://www.cms.gov/Research-Statistics-Data-and-Systems/Statistics-Trends-and-Reports/NationalHealthExpendData/Downloads/dsm-11.pdf (accessed January 10, 2013).
  2. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). Quick Definitions for National Health Expenditure Accounts (NHEA) Categories. 2011b. Available at: http://www.cms.gov/Research-Statistics-Data-and-Systems/Statistics-Trends-and-Reports/NationalHealthExpendData/Downloads/quickref.pdf (accessed January 10, 2013).
  3. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), Office of the Actuary. National Health Expenditures by type of service and source of funds: CY 1960-2011. Last updated December 27, 2012. Available at: https://www.cms.gov/Research-Statistics-Data-and-Systems/Statistics-Trends-and-Reports/NationalHealthExpendData/Downloads/NHE2011.zip (accessed January 10, 2013).
  4. Cooper BS, NL Worthington and MF McGee. Compendium of National Health Expenditures Data. DHEW Pub No (SSA) 73-11903. Office of Research and Statistics. 1973.
  5. Hartman MB, RJ Kornfeld, and AC Catlin. A Reconciliation of Health Care Expenditures in the National Health Expenditures Accounts and in Gross Domestic Product . Survey of Current Business, September 2010: 42-52. Available at: http://www.bea.gov/scb/pdf/2010/09%20September/0910_healthcare.pdf (accessed March 21, 2013).

Content actions

Download module as:

PDF | EPUB (?)

What is an EPUB file?

EPUB is an electronic book format that can be read on a variety of mobile devices.

Downloading to a reading device

For detailed instructions on how to download this content's EPUB to your specific device, click the "(?)" link.

| More downloads ...

Add module to:

My Favorites (?)

'My Favorites' is a special kind of lens which you can use to bookmark modules and collections. 'My Favorites' can only be seen by you, and collections saved in 'My Favorites' can remember the last module you were on. You need an account to use 'My Favorites'.

| A lens I own (?)

Definition of a lens

Lenses

A lens is a custom view of the content in the repository. You can think of it as a fancy kind of list that will let you see content through the eyes of organizations and people you trust.

What is in a lens?

Lens makers point to materials (modules and collections), creating a guide that includes their own comments and descriptive tags about the content.

Who can create a lens?

Any individual member, a community, or a respected organization.

What are tags? tag icon

Tags are descriptors added by lens makers to help label content, attaching a vocabulary that is meaningful in the context of the lens.

Reuse / Edit:

Reuse or edit module (?)

Check out and edit

If you have permission to edit this content, using the "Reuse / Edit" action will allow you to check the content out into your Personal Workspace or a shared Workgroup and then make your edits.

Derive a copy

If you don't have permission to edit the content, you can still use "Reuse / Edit" to adapt the content by creating a derived copy of it and then editing and publishing the copy.

  • © 2012 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved.
  • The University of Minnesota is an equal opportunity educator and employer. Privacy
  • Last modified on Sep 11, 2013 5:40 pm -0500